TECHZIE.BLOGSPOT.COM

Your TECH GADGET GURU


The Obama administration is drafting legislation to expand wiretap authority to intercept all Facebook, BlackBerry and Skype communications.

The Obama administration is working on a proposal that would make it easier for law enforcement and security officials to eavesdrop on online chatter, including e-mail, instant messaging and social networks, reported The New York Times on Sept. 27.

The proposed legislation will likely come before Congress next year.

The White House-sponsored bill would require all Internet-based communication services to be technically capable of complying with a federal wiretap order. This includes being able to intercept and unscramble encrypted messages, said the Times.

It will give the government the ability to listen in on literally every communication anyone makes online.

While the officials working on the proposal do not yet agree on how to define what constitutes a communications service provider, encrypted e-mail transmitters like the BlackBerry, social networking sites like Facebook and peer-to-peer messaging software like Skype will likely be included. The Obama administration prefers the broadest definition, which would include companies whose servers are operated outside of the United States, such as Canadian-based Research In Motion, maker of BlackBerry smartphones.

"We're not talking expanding authority," Federal Bureau of Investigation General Counsel Valerie Caproni told the Times. "We're talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security."

Federal law enforcement and national security officials have been demanding more control over Internet wiretapping, arguing that extremists and criminals are more likely to chat online than using telephones.

The proposal raises serious privacy concerns about users on the Internet, reminiscent of the uproar that followed Bush administration's expansion of thegovernment's wiretapping authority. It could also set an example for other companies to follow, the Times said.

"They basically want to turn back the clock and make Internet services function the way that the telephone system used to function," Vice President of the Center for Democracy and Technology James X Dempsey told the Times.

RIM has been dealing with this issue over the past few months. Several countries, including India and Saudi Arabia, threatened to ban BlackBerry services, claiming the device's e-mail encryption posed a national security risk. RIM agreed to give security officials "lawful access" to data; United States officials would like similar access under the proposed law.

Internet and phone networks are already required to have eavesdropping abilities thanks to a 1994 law called the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act. While extending the wiretap authority to include digital networks and cell phones, and not just copper-wire phone systems, the law does not apply to communications service providers.

Under the current rules, investigators can intercept messages at the network company's switch. If the user is using a service that encrypts the messages between the computer and the servers, investigators have to go to the communications service provider to view the unscrambled content. While some service providers have the capability to intercept these messages, most do not. According to the Times report, many providers wait until they are served with wiretap orders before developing intercept capabilities.

However, some services, like peer-to-peer instant messaging software, encrypt messages between users, so even the provider cannot unscramble them. The proposed legislation will require these programs to be redesigned so that they can be unscrambled.

"They can promise strong encryption. They just need to figure out how they can provide us plain text," said Caproni.

According to the report, officials from the White House, Justice Department, National Security Agency, FBI and other agencies have been working on the proposals, but important elements still have to be worked out.


Iran admits Stuxnet worm infected PCs at nuclear reactor

But denies that 'groundbreaking' malware infiltrated control systems or caused major damage





Computerworld - Although some computers at Iran's Bushehr nuclear reactor were infected by the Stuxnet worm, none of the facility's crucial control systems were affected, Iranian officials claimed Sunday.

The news followed Saturday's admission by Iran that Stuxnet had infected at least 30,000 computers in the country. The worm, which researchers have dubbed the most sophisticated malware ever, targets Windows PCs that manage large-scale industrial-control systems in manufacturing and utility companies.

Those control systems, called SCADA, for "supervisory control and data acquisition," manage and monitor machinery in power plants, factories, pipelines and military installations.

"The studies show that few PCs of Bushehr nuclear power plant workers are infected with the virus," Mahmoud Jafari, the facility's project manager, told Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency on Sunday.

Jafari denied that the worm had caused major damage to SCADA systems or that Stuxnet had delayed the reactor's completion.

Bushehr is slated to go online in the next few months. In late August, workers began loading the reactor with nuclear fuel.

Stuxnet has attracted as much attention for its presumed target as for its technical expertise. Shortly after a Belarus antivirus firm reported finding the worm, U.S.-based security company Symantec noted that Iran was hit hardest, with approximately 60% of all infections traced to that country's computers.

Since then, experts have amassed evidence that Stuxnet has been attacking industrial control systems since at least January 2010, while others have speculated that the worm was developed by a state-sponsored team of programmers and was designed to cripple the Bushehr reactor.

The reactor, located in southwestern Iran near the Persian Gulf, has been one of the flash points of tension between Iran and the West, including the U.S., which believes that spent fuel from the reactor could be reprocessed elsewhere in the country to produce weapons-grade plutonium for use in nuclear warheads.

Liam O Murchu, manager of operations on Symantec's security response team, and one of the researchers who has been analyzing Stuxnet since it popped into public view, said there was not enough evidence to conclude that the worm was aimed at Bushehr.

"I've also seen reports [from Iranian officials] that the Bushehr reactor doesn't use Siemens software," said O Murchu, referring to the German electronics giant's control program that Stuxnet specifically targets. "So if it doesn't use Siemens software, the Windows machines may have been infected but not the SCADA software."

At the same time, O Murchu said that in plants that do use Siemens SCADA software, the likelihood of Stuxnet spreading from an infected Windows computer to the facility's industrial control systems was "quite high."

"Stuxnet can spread using several vectors," O Murchu said. "It's quite likely that it would be able to crawl the network and infect the Siemens software."

Later Sunday a different Iranian official also denied that Stuxnet had caused any problems at Bushehr. About four hours after quoting Jafari, the Islamic Republic News Agency published another story, citing Asghar Zarean, deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization in charge of safety and security, who reiterated that Stuxnet had not impacted the plant's control systems.

Zarean claimed that "no penetration by the virus had been observed" in the agency's nuclear facilities. He also said that precautions had been taken to stymie Stuxnet from further infection.

Stuxnet, called "groundbreaking" by another researcher actively analyzing the worm, used multiple unpatched, or "zero-day," vulnerabilities in Windows; relied on stolen digital certificates to disguise the malware; hid its code by using a rootkit; and reprogrammed PLC (programmable logic control) software to give new instructions to machinery that software managed.

Microsoft has patched two of the four vulnerabilities exploited by Stuxnet and has promised to fix the remaining flaws at some unspecified future date.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at Twitter @gkeizer or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed Keizer RSS. His e-mail address isgkeizer@computerworld.com.


Quantum computing is one step closer to reality, thanks to work done by a team of international scientists at the University of Bristol... Jeremy O’Brien however, certainly has an impressive designation as the Director of the Centre of Quantum Photonics in the United Kingdom, and he has a very interesting announcement to make: “We can say with real confidence that, using our new technique, a quantum computer could, within five years, be performing calculations that are outside the capabilities of conventional computers."

So, what exactly has the team of international researchers at the University of Bristol done? They have designed a photonic chip that works with photons, rather than the electrons that are used in conventional processors. The chip currently has “several [working] models”, and will apparently work by sending entangled photons down pathways/networks in a silicon chip. Together, the entangled photons will perform a “coordinated quantum walk”, and the outcome of this process will represent the “results of a calculation.”


Also called an optical chip, the photonic chip’s network of optical circuits allows for a quantum walk to occur with two photons and be detected, which is the underlying basis for the entire discovery. Previously, scientists had achieved a quantum walk with single photons, but with two photons, they were challenged by the requirement of ensuring that the two photons are exactly identical, and then take into account their particle-particle interaction within the circuit. Now that they have done it, the possibilities really open up, and, according to the same scientists, going from two to many photons will not be very hard, as the same principles apply. Each time you increase the number of photons, the number of possible outcomes increases exponentially, allowing scientists to simulate extremely complex situations and models. So, for now, the next goal is performing multi-photon walks.

The concept of the quantum walk comes from the mathematical concept of the random walk, which can be defined as the “trajectory of an object taking successive steps in a random direction”, whether in two or multi-dimensional space. A random walk takes special meaning when dealing with quantum particles, as randomness here is inherent at every step. With the trajectory provided by the coordinated quantum walks of two entangled photons, scientists have been able to perform a new kind of computation with newly developed algorithms, which will perform orders of magnitude faster than today’s processors.

Check out how small the photonic chip is, placed next to a UK penny.

Mr. O’Brien added that the software that could run on such a processor architecture had yet to be developed, and input-output devices would have to re-developed as well. The first real-world applications you can hope to see will be in the world of science, where simulations relying on the assimilation of millions of variables are required. All this is possible because of the inherent uncertain nature of quantum physics, which can allows for a single subatomic particle to be in several places at simultaneously: “unlike an electronic 'bit' in conventional computing, the use of quantum particles, or 'qubits,' permits parallel computing on a scale that would not be possible with conventional electronics.”

Image courtesy: Gizmag ; source : Digit





Sorry for the inconvenience !....


Iam presently busy with my studies so i cannot maintain this for some days
will be back soon

-Tech Guru

What was known as the BlackBerry Bold 9800 is now officially the BlackBerry Torch, a QWERTY-slider phone that’s powered by a 624MHz Marvell processor, and runs on BlackBerry 6 OS. Some blogs in the United States have already got their hands on the device, which was exclusively launched on AT&T, and all of them have a lot to say about how the phone feels and functions. This is a roundup of some of the most insightful impressions






Like all BlackBerry phones, the Torch’s QWERTY keypad is supposedly flawless, with great tactile feedback and perfect spacing/layout. The slider is solid, and the phone built sturdily all round.

The screen is not very large when compared with other modern smartphones, and has a comparatively low resolution of 480x360. The capacitive touchscreen was thought to be responsive though, with great multi-touch gesture controls.
As for the interface, the phone was apparently well-integrated with social networks and instant messaging, giving users aggregated feeds in a unified inbox.

Performance-wise, the phone’s 624MHz processor reportedly seemed slow, as did the browser – at least compared to the iPhone 4.

As an all-out business phone, it wouldn’t be fair to compare the BlackBerry Torch to an iPhone 4 or any modern Android device, but if one did, the most obvious disadvantage the Torch has is the lack of apps/games in BlackBerry App World, which are available in their thousands at the Android Market and Apple App Store.

Another disadvantage in the sphere of multimedia and apps is the lack of internal memory, which amounts to 4GB onboard, and a 4GB microSD card that ships with the device, making to 8GB total. This can of course be expanded to 36GB total, with a 32GB microSD card.

As for battery life, the phone is again behind its other BlackBerry siblings, offering 5.5 hours of talk time and 432 hours of standby time with its 1300 mAh battery.

While the 5MP camera is considered sufficient, the lack of a front-facing camera is questionable, as is the lack of HDMI output, though the phone does play quite a few video formats, such as MP4, WMV, H.263 and H.264.

Looking at all the above, it seems that RIM has not really got a trump card on its hands, just when it most needed one. Competing against smartphones that might not fit the niche of business readily, BlackBerry either had to choose to focus completely on making its new flagship a business monster, or make it as multi-functional as its competition. By choosing the second route, RIM has taken the more difficult path, competing against established players in the media and apps world. At least though, it doesn't have any antenna issues!



Dubai-based Infinitec has finally overcome ‘industry delays’, and has put its much-awaitedInfinite USB Memory Drive, or IUM, up for pre-order. Priced at $129 with shipping starting at the end of the month, on August 31, the IUM Drive promises to offer unheard of wireless storage and networking possibilities in the near future.

The delay did the IUM Drive some good though, as it now sports the dual-WiFi feature, which allows a laptop to connect both to a WiFi network as well as the IUM’s ad-hoc wireless network, simultaneously.

In case you haven’t heard of the Infinite USB Memory Drive before, you can check out our previous comprehensive coverage of the device
here, or you can check out Infinitec’s just-released video explanation of the IUM below:



An ethical hacker demonstrated exactly what you can make with $1500 worth of equipment: a cell phone call interceptor. Using not much more than a laptop and two RF antennas, Chris Paget showed off his interception technology at DefCon 2010, convincingly proving just how unsecure2G GSM networks are.

His equipment managed to fool cell phones in the audience that the setup was a real cell phone base station, and when they automatically routed their calls through it, he was able to intercept and record the conversations, which included encrypted calls. While this technology only works on outgoing calls at present, Chris Paget’s equipment can easily be duplicated, a worrying fact by itself, apart from the flaw in 2G GSM network acquisition protocols, which automatically redirect phones to connect to the base station with the strongest signal, regardless of its origin. In this manner, encrypted calls are not free from interception, because the base station can simply deactivate it once it acquires the signal. Though GSM specs insist that a cell phone should display a warning if it is forced to connect to a station that doesn’t have encryption, most SIM cards disable this feature to avoid innumerable alerts during operation. In essence, your call could be intercepted and recorded without your slightest knowledge.

This technology is nothing new in theory, and governments already use what are called IMSI catchers to pull off a similar feat, which can even capture data transfers. However, what is revolutionary is the low-cost and ease with which the setup can be made and procured, by anyone from the common man to the underfunded terrorist.

As you can imagine, the demonstration has already created a furore in the industry, with security experts as well as carriers suddenly worried about how to make 2G GSM networks safer. On the flip-side, maybe a version of this technology could be used by governments to monitor calls that they were previously unable to decrypt, specifically, the Indian government’s current need to decode BlackBerry calls


source: digit

Place an Ad